Pelosi pledged to run the most ethical congress in history. She was going to "DRAIN THE SWAMP" as in almost everything, PELOSI IS ONE OF THE MOST UNETHICAL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, lying and distorting the truth so often, bringing pork to her district to benefit her husbands real estate investments,handing our pork to supporters in her district and elsewhere and using her position to milk the taxpayers of tens of millions on her travel and parties.
Why is it a surprise that Pelosi will NOT RISK ANTAGONIZING THE BLACK CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS (Rangel was a founder) by insisting on rapid hearings and severe sanctions for Charlie The Tax Cheat Rangel who has clearly committed a number of unethical, if not criminal, acts?
Rangel makes a meaningless gesture, NOT RESIGNING HIS CHAIRMANSHIP of the House Ways and Means Committee, BUT MERELY TAKING A "LEAVE OF ABSENCE".
Meanwhile, Rangel and Pelosi both come from districts with "safe" demographics, so they can do just about anything and get reelected time and again.
Once the 2010 elections are over and his chairmanship can no longer be used for criticizing the ethics of the Democrats, Charlie Tax Cheat will be back in the Chairmanship if the Democrats retain the majority, ending his "leave of absence".
Meanwhile, WHAT IS GOING THROUGH THE MINDS OF THE VOTERS IN THE DISTRICTS OF PELOSI (CA), RANGEL (NY) and BARNEY FRANK (MA), that these three keep getting elected. These politicians are corrupt way above the common congressman and have acted for self-interest above all and have done enormous harm to the country pushing or blocking legislation to favor their special interests and personal friends or relatives. How can these three have "safe seats"? What is wrong with the people in those districts?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment